SENATOR TOOMEY–THE SELF-SERVING SWAMP REPUBLICAN

It appears Pat Toomey has joined the Biden Campaign with his now daily remarks pretending to somehow be possessed with the moral and intellectual high ground relative to whether an election fraught with systemic and multiple random examples of Vote Count Fraud should be challenged to the fullest extent under the law. His existence in the US Senate has finally been recognized as he is now the new champion of the Mainstream Media and the corrupted Democrat Party.

 

Frankly, Toomey’s arrogance and ignorance of the Voter Fraud situations across multiple states including Pennsylvania is beyond words. Does he have any basis for his perception that he knows the needs of America and the voters at a level superior to President Trump, Ted Cruz, Mike Kelly and a multitude of other true Republicans? The answer lies in his performance in his last election in 2016 when Donald Trump was also elected to the presidency!!

 

One might think Toomey, Pennsylvania resident, perhaps had attracted more Republican voters than Trump for him to have such a high opinion of himself. Wrong!!! Trump received 2.97 million votes while Toomey received 2.95 million votes indicating that Trump probably pulled Toomey across the finish line in Toomey’s narrow victory over his Democrat opponent.

Last, and probably more indicative of Toomey as a 2020 spokesman for Biden are the counties in Pennsylvania where he did beat President Trump  which are the same heavily Democrat counties that, along with Philadelphia, basically offset the 58 Republican counties in Pennsylvania.

 

In fact, to illustrate the point, Toomey’s votes exceeded President Trump by approximately 85,000 in the following six dominantly Democrat counties: Allegheny, Montgomery Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Philadelphia, and Lancaster.

 

So, who is Toomey serving with his most recent media-oriented denial of Voter Fraud while the President continues to pursue constitutionally guaranteed alternatives showing Voter Fraud of truly unbelievable proportions in the critical battleground states and even Nevada. The real FRAUD is Toomey placing an “R” by his name while ignoring the Voter Fraud facts and the 58 Republican counties in Pennsylvania that elected Donald Trump to the presidency.

 

William E. Been

 

Prepared on 12/17/2020 (After Toomey’s most recent attack on the President while supporting

DNI Ratcliffe’s Pending Report: ‘It’s Going To Blow The Mind Of Every Citizen Of The Country’

DNI Ratcliffe’s Pending Report: ‘It’s Going To Blow The Mind Of Every Citizen Of The Country’ – Dr. Rich Swier

Director of Intelligence John Ratcliffe said in a Sunday morning last week that there might not be a Joe Biden administration. While appearing for an extensive interview with the Epoch Times on Sunday, attorney Sidney Powell discussed irregularities she has uncovered over the course of her investigation into alleged election-related fraud, and expressed confidence that the time is soon approaching where most of her bombshell claims will be confirmed.

BREAKING BOMBSHELL: MI Judge Grants Attorney Matt DePerno Permission To RELEASE Results Of Forensic Examination On 16 Dominion Voting Machines In Antrim Co. [VIDEO]

This morning, during an emergency hearing, MI 13th Circuit Court Judge Kevin A Elsenheimer granted permission to Attorney Matthew Deperno to release the findings from their forensic examination of 16 Dominion Voting machines in Antrim County, MI where thousands of votes flipped from President Trump to Joe Biden on November 3, 2020.

 

Earlier this week, we reported about a lawsuit filed by Matthew DePerno of DePerno Law on behalf of Central Lake resident William Bailey. In addition to thousands of votes that were flipped from President Trump to Democrat candidate Joe Biden, Bailey was concerned about ballots that were re-run through the Dominion tabulator machine after a 262-262 tie on a vote a ballot initiative that would allow a marijuana establishment to be located within the Village of Central Lake.

While ballots were being inserted into the machine, 3 of them were destroyed and were not placed through the tabulator. At the conclusion of the recount by the tabulating machine and with three fewer votes, the result was 262-261, and the initiative passed. Of course, this result could only be possible after 3 of the ballots were destroyed.

Read more:

BREAKING BOMBSHELL: MI Judge Grants Attorney Matt DePerno Permission To RELEASE Results Of Forensic Examination On 16 Dominion Voting Machines In Antrim Co. [VIDEO]

This morning, during an emergency hearing, MI 13th Circuit Court Judge Kevin A Elsenheimer granted permission to Attorney Matthew Deperno to release the findings from their forensic examination of 16 Dominion Voting machines in Antrim County, MI where thousands of votes flipped from President Trump to Joe Biden on November 3, 2020.

We Don’t Need SCOTUS to Win

The Texas suit, later joined by other states, against Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Georgia, was a nice try, but it was always a long shot.  Of course SCOTUS would be reluctant to grab so much power by ordering state legislatures to seat the right electors.  Why?  Because the power is already in the hands of the legislatures to do this.

Though we are non-lawyers, let’s read these laws together, interpreting them minimally and plainly (something lawyers seem incapable of doing).  The first federal law for our purposes, titled “Determination of controversy as to appointment of electors,” says:

If any State shall have provided, by laws enacted prior to the day fixed for the appointment of the electors, for its final determination of any controversy or contest concerning the appointment of all or any of the electors of such State, by judicial or other methods or procedures, and such determination shall have been made at least six days before the time fixed for the meeting of the electors, such determination made pursuant to such law so existing on said day, and made at least six days prior to said time of meeting of the electors, shall be conclusive, and shall govern in the counting of the electoral votes as provided in the Constitution, and as hereinafter regulated, so far as the ascertainment of the electors appointed by such State is concerned.

So this provision, if I understand it correctly, says that states may appoint electors after a controversy (“controversy or contest”).  Now, what happens when fraud and illegalities are so egregious that they help one candidate exclusively and harm only one candidate in such a way that it is unclear which electors shall be appointed?  That definitely qualifies to become a “controversy or contest.”  The provision opens the door to each state legislature having the right to determine how the state can appoint electors (“appointment of electors” and “ascertainment of electors”).  (This is already clear in the Twelfth Amendment, but here this provision gives more clarity after a controversy.)  Bottom line: The electors for Biden, the “fake winner,” can be set aside if that is what each individual state law allows.  Read the full story below.

We Don’t Need SCOTUS to Win

The Texas suit, later joined by other states, against Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Georgia, was a nice try, but it was always a long shot. Of course SCOTUS would be reluctant to grab so much power by ordering state legislatures t…