New High of 60% Say China Should Pay Some of World’s Coronavirus Costs

More voters than ever consider China an enemy and think the Asian giant should pick up the tab for at least some of the global costs of the coronavirus.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 60% of Likely U.S. Voters now think China should pay at least some of the financial costs that have resulted from the global transmission of the coronavirus which originated in a Chinese city. That’s up from 42% when Rasmussen Reports first asked this question in mid-March and 53% in late July. Only 24% believe China should not be made to pay some of these costs, while 16% are undecided.

New High of 60% Say China Should Pay Some of World’s Coronavirus Costs

If it’s in the News, it’s in our Polls. Public opinion polling since 2003. More voters than ever consider China an enemy and think the Asian giant should pick up the tab for at least some of the global costs of the coronavirus.


A new report seen by The National Pulse begins: “This scientific analysis of the reported Pennsylvania (PA) 2020 Presidential voting results, is a non-partisan effort by unpaid citizens and volunteer experts. Our only objective is to play a small roll in helping assure that all legal PA votes are counted, and that only legal PA votes are counted.”

The report concludes: “These statistical analyses do not prove fraud, but rather provide scientific evidence that the reported results are highly unlikely to be an accurate reflection of how Pennsylvania citizens voted.”

On pages 14 and 15 the report reveals:

“We seek to estimate the fraction of registered Democratic voters that voted among the outlier counties. We want an unbiased estimate, so we removed Allegheny and Philadelphia counties as they are rather unique. Ten counties were used for simple linear regression.


“The data are fit well with a simple line.

Biden2020 = -21215.45 + 1.1943149*Democratic

EXC: New Stats Analysis Reveals Potential ‘Stuffing The Tail’ Voter Fraud Scheme Similar to 2008 Sub-Prime Mortgage Meltdown

New analysis of Pennsylvania election data buttresses the Trump campaign’s assertions that a host of voting irregularities and potential fraud contributed to a victory in the critical swing state for Joe Biden. A new report seen by The National Pulse begins: “This scientific analysis of the reported Pennsylvania (PA) 2020 Presidential voting results, is a non-partisan effort by unpaid citizens and volunteer experts.

Trump on Contested Election: ‘I Can’t Tell You What’s Going to Happen’


November 16, 2020 Updated: November 16, 2020


President Donald Trump told the New York Post in an interview Friday that he is determined to continue challenging the results of the presidential election in court, and said of his expectations for the outcome of the contested election, “I can’t tell you what’s going to happen.”

Trump told the Post’s Michael Goodwin that he believes “this election was stolen,” pointed to enthusiasm shown for his candidacy at large-scale rallies, railed against the voting software system used to tally votes, and insisted that “it’s not possible” that he lost.

Asked whether he would accept the results if his raft of legal challenges fail, he said, “We’ll see how it turns out.”

“It’s hard to come to terms when they won’t let your poll watchers in to observe” vote tabulation, Trump said, adding, “Again, I can’t tell you what’s going to happen.”

Trump has several outstanding legal challenges in key battleground states, and there is speculation that if some of these are successful in blocking certification of election results, neither candidate would receive the needed 270 Electoral College votes and a “contingent election” could ensue, in which state delegates in the House would choose the president.

It is a path to a possible Trump victory that Harvard law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz outlined in an interview with Newsmax, predicting that Trump’s strategy would focus on denying Democratic nominee Joe Biden’s chances of getting 270 votes.

“What he’s trying to do is to deny Joe Biden 270 votes, by challenging in Pennsylvania, Georgia, in Nevada, in Michigan, in Arizona,” Dershowitz said, adding that not allowing Biden to reach 270 out of 538 votes would eventually force House state delegations to vote, where Republicans have an advantage over Democrats. Currently, the GOP has a 26-23-1 state delegation majority in the House of Representatives.

“If he can keep the Biden count below 270, then the matter goes to the House of Representatives, where, of course, there is a Republican majority among the delegations of states, and you vote by state if it goes to the House,” Dershowitz said. “He’s trying to follow the playbook of three elections of the 19th century.”

Trump’s campaign or legal team haven’t publicly stated whether that strategy is in play.

Continue reading “Trump on Contested Election: ‘I Can’t Tell You What’s Going to Happen’”

BOMBSHELL: The 2020 election took place under a Trump-declared “National Emergency”

BOMBSHELL: The 2020 election took place under a Trump-declared

Parler Gab We have another major bombshell for you here, regarding the 2020 election. Despite the intense, malicious censorship of Big Tech, we’re really becoming known for in-depth analysis and research of current events, so thank you for your support as we continue to fight for the very survival of America, our constitutional republic.



OBJECTIVE. The focus of this article is to reveal the Voter Fraud methods used by the Democrat Party to determine election outcomes in any relatively close election. These methods will be presented using the article published by The Hill written by Ben Komisar and Lisa Hagen who documented the timeline of the events in the final hours before a winner was declared in the March 13, 2018 Special Election involving the newly gerrymandered Pennsylvania District 18.

BACKGROUND. Suspicions of systemic voter suppression led to the formation of a small Ad hoc Citizens Task group to investigate the surprisingly low GOP turnout in the 2012 election of Barack Obama. This group conducted surveys including phone and door-to-door contact with Frequent Voter Republicans who showed to have not voted in the Allegheny County Voter History report. Of 230 respondents, 104 said they had voted including 23 on affidavits. The result of this survey provided further indication of voter suppression directly impacting the final counts during the consolidation phase of results from the Allegheny County Precincts.  

SPECIAL ELECTION OF MARCH 13, 2018. When the national Democrats started broadcasting the Special Election for PA 18 as the indicator of their highly publicized Great Blue Wave, it was quickly recognized the election would be a target requiring a mandatory victory. With The Hill providing the timeline of events involving the “counting” of Absentee ballots, it was evident that the management of the Absentee ballots was either lacking or perhaps manipulated. This led to an analysis of the ballots cast by voters versus the Final Certified Count.

To see if every Absentee ballot cast was included in the count, a comparison of the Final Certified Absentee Count by Precinct was made to the ballots cast by individual voters as published in the County Voter History Report. As expected, there was disagreement with the reconciliation revealing that 555 voters by name were shown to have cast an Absentee ballot according to the Voter History Report but their votes were not included in the Final Certified Count. 

However, even with recognition of the 555 Absentee ballot vote discrepancy, there was still an additional discrepancy of what appeared to be adjustments at the Precinct level in votes cast at the polls (AP) causing an additional discrepancy of 299 votes. Here is where the most dangerous, yet clever, situation was discovered. The 299 votes consisted of small adjustments by Precinct with 497 votes added spread over 121 Precincts netted against 198 votes deducted from 89 mutually exclusive Precincts. The two adjustments of additions and deductions net to 299 votes and there is now total agreement between the Voter History summation and the adjusted Final Count!!  The alleged “clerical errors” of 2012 are gone!  (The 39 Military ballots are ignored in this final comparison but, for the record, were not included in the Voter History Report at the time it was distributed to the public.)

The question one might ask is why the 299 consisted of multiple small pluses and small minuses at the Precinct level.   Since we don’t know which candidate a voter selects, it would appear that biased adjustments would add “count” to the more desired candidate and subtract “count” from the undesired opponent. Therefore, the 497 added votes plus the 198 reduced votes would generate a potential MARGIN OF VICTORY for the chosen candidate consisting of 695 with 497 added for the chosen and 198 reduced for the opponent. 

The near absolutely impossible probability that this number of adjustments could be made with near perfect Total Vote agreement almost assures that an algorithm was introduced at some point in the vote counting process. How novel that you can adjust the votes at the candidate level and mask the fraud at the Total Certified Vote level. (For the record, you can read the small pluses and minuses on the Voter History when sorted by Precinct.)

TIMELINE FROM THE HILL  (My Editorial comments in Italics). The early returns indicated a near landslide for Conor Lamb prompting GOP Former Rep Joe Walsh to say the “Republicans need a wake-up call.”

At 9:16 p.m., it was reported “the gap is shrinking between the two candidates”

At 9:40 p.m. the gap was down to 4 points which prompted the comment “…the race looks set to come down to the wire.”

At 10:16 p.m. “Lamb’s early lead has now nearly evaporated with 96 percent of precincts reporting.”

At 10:12 p.m. …just 1,132 votes separate the two candidates.

At this point, there is a lull in the reporting from Allegheny County while it looks like the lead is changing hands which I believe in fact occurred causing great concern in the Democrat ranks!!!!!

At 10:32 Dave Wasserman from Cook Political Report’s commented “Absentee ballots could boost Lamb’s dwindling lead.”

At 10:53 p.m. The Hill reports “The special election will likely come down to the absentee ballots, but two counties won’t count and post those votes until Wednesday morning…”

At 10:55 p.m. “Lamb leads by just 95 votes”

Then, at 11:15 p.m., This is the most critical time period as the lull in reporting is over. Lamb was reported to suddenly be up by 847 votes as Allegheny reported a net of 752 Absentee votes for Lamb. We know now that there were 555 Absentee votes that were never reported  in the Official Counts. To say highly suspicious is an understatement. 

At 11:25, the Lamb crisis becomes even more severe  having used the 555 Absentees and Washington County reporting 1,195 absentee ballots to be counted

At 11:42 p.m. the Associated Press stated “With some absentee ballots still outstanding, the race is too close to call.”

However, almost immediately after the AP statement and exactly 2 minutes later, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee declared victory and congratulated Lamb with at statement from Nancy Pelosi lapdog Rep. Ben Ray Lujan (N.M.). Within 71 minutes, Lamb was declaring victory while his lead had again fallen to 579 votes as of 12:10 p.m. and the Republicans were rightfully saying the election was too close to call.

At this point, it is the writer’s opinion that there was panic in Pittsburgh resulting in the use of the algorithm to insure victory as vote counting continued in other counties, and since the national Democrat Party in Washington had declared victory , they had to make it good and, as a result, used their voter fraud nuclear option being the algorithm. 

At 12:53 p.m. as Lamb declared victory the ‘media outlets still haven’t called the race and Saccone hasn’t conceded.” This would also be panic time if the algorithm had not yet been used!!! In any event, the use of the algorithm was a must as the national Great Blue Wave was at stake and the pressure was definitely on after the Pelosi directive. 

The final margin of victory for Lamb was 755 votes and there can be little doubt this victory was accomplished by multiple applications of Democrat Voter Fraud technique; namely, suppression of Republican ballots and use of an algorithm to distribute illegal votes unsupported by the Voter History Report.   

Concerning Allegheny County and the 2020 election, the United States Supreme Court order to separate all ballots received after 8:00 PM on Election Day is critical to provide a means of monitoring the official counts to assure all legal ballots are included in the official counts while assuring all illegal ballots received are not included in the counts. Generating the Voter History Report and providing the analysis described throughout this document in accordance with the United States Supreme Court order will provide considerable assurance of election integrity.  In summary, for every legal ballot there must be a count and for every count there must be a ballot and the Allegheny County Voter History is a superb tool to provide this assurance. 


Prepared By: William E. Been

Author of Masters of Audacity and Deceit

November 10, 2020




20 Reasons Election 2020 Is Far From Over


Now that the media has declared Joe Biden the next president of the United States, let’s take a look at the state of play: 1. Donald Trump is legally the president until his term expires at noon on Jan. 20, 2021. Nothing that happened last week or will happen until Jan. 20 will affect his position or authority in any way.

2. Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. is neither the president nor the president-elect.

3. There is no such thing as the “office of the president-elect.”

Barack Obama invented this phantom unconstitutional position back in 2008. It didn’t matter then and it doesn’t matter now, except in the minds of the media.

4. Biden will not be president-elect until the Electoral College meets on Dec. 14, if then. However …

5. Dec. 8 is the so-called “safe harbor” date, by which the states, under federal law, must have resolved any and all controversies regarding a disputed election, and their governors must so certify, in order for the names of the actual electors to be reported to the national archivist.

6. Neither state governors nor courts, including their high courts, have any authority over how federal elections are conducted in their states.

7. If the election results are still in doubt by Dec. 8—as they might well be—the Trump campaign could ask the state legislatures in the disputed battleground to set aside the tainted tallies and use their plenary powers under Article 1, Section 4 of the U.S.

Constitution to appoint and certify slates of electors favorable to the GOP.

8. Republicans now fully control 24 states, in which they have both houses of the legislature and the state house, including the battleground states of Arizona and Florida. Meanwhile, in Michigan, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Wisconsin, they control the legislatures, but the governors are Democrats.

All six of those states could send Trump slates to the feds by Dec.

8, if they wish. Whether their Democratic governors would certify the slates is, of course, another matter. By contrast, the Democrats control only one current battleground state in which the vote is in dispute, Nevada, with a majority in the legislature and a Democrat as governor.

9. Should the election be thrown into the House of Representatives— as it was in 1800 and 1824—each state delegation gets one vote for president, and Trump would win, 31–18.

For those scoring at home, that would mean 185,895,957 Americans, voting via their congressional delegations, would outvote 133,888,565 people living in Democrat states.

10. At the moment, the key state is also the Keystone State, whose 20 electoral votes would put Biden over the top, along with Arizona should they withstand legal challenges. Highly partisan Democratic control of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and the governor’s mansion, however, has thus far ensured the state will remain contentious to the end. Reverse those votes, however, and then the quest for the White House all comes down to Georgia.

11. There can be no doubt that

Fraud is fraud, and therefore its presence should rightfully invalidate the entire election, at least within each state where it provably occured. It’s time to rein in the media.

Nobody—not even they themselves— views them as impartial reporters and factfinders any more. in several states, the results have been highly questionable, including Michigan and Wisconsin, in which mysterious tranches of votes—in some cases 100 percent for Biden—arrived in the dead of night during a “lull” in the counting, allowing the Democrats to figure out how many votes they needed for the former veep to pull ahead.

12. Elsewhere, electronic “glitches” have been reported, switching Trump votes to Biden, although rarely if ever the other way around. But this is par for the course regarding important elections, in which the Democrats somehow pull off amazing statistical improbabilities/impossibilities and nip the Republican candidate at the wire every time. Only once in recent history has it been stopped: in Florida in 2000, and there, they fumbled by asking for recounts in only three, heavily Democrat counties.

13. We can thank the weaponization of the CCP virus, in the guise of the overwhelmingly non-lethal COVID-19 disease, for much of the chaos. The Democrats have been pushing the boundaries of what constitutes a free and fair election, bulldozing constitutional and social norms in order to remove as many protections against arrant fraud as they possibly could, all in the name of “fairness.” The virus gave them the excuse to liberalize “early voting” and thus trash law and custom for our own “safety.”

14. During one of his few campaign appearances, the bumbling Biden made the following unconditional statement: “We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.” Imagine the howling on the left had Trump said something like that. And yet fraud and the Democratic Party have gone hand-in-hand at least since Tammany Hall in the 19th century. Indeed, it has become the punchline of a joke everybody knows, including Democrats. Except, they’re proud of it.

15. Some conservative commentators, among them lawyers, have tried to make the point that, yes, there’s fraud, but it really doesn’t matter unless it materially affects the outcome of the election. These are the same lawyers, by the way, who employ the doctrine of “falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus” (false in one detail, false in all) to discredit eyewitness testimony in big trials.

16. But fraud is fraud, and therefore its presence should rightfully invalidate the entire election, at least within each state where it provably occurs. It ought not to matter whether it involves outright ballot theft, forged ballots, illegal-alien ballots, fake “early voting” ballots, or obviously manufactured ballots delivered days after the nominal end of Election Day.

17. There was a time, perhaps, when a Richard Nixon—who knew he’d been cheated in Illinois by Chicago’s Mayor Richard Daley out of the 1960 election—could put country before party and refuse to challenge JFK’s hairsbreadth victory. But those days are long gone; the stakes are simply too high.

18. Everybody back then knew the Nixon and Kennedy differed in policy, not in love of country.

Today’s critical-theory Democrats don’t love the country as founded, they love it for the kind of socialist utopia into which they’d like to fundamentally transform it. Don’t be fooled by their expressions of “patriotism.”


19. It’s time to rein in the media. Nobody— not even they themselves— views them as impartial reporters and fact-finders any more.

Overwhelmingly leftist in outlook, today’s “reporters” prefer to think of themselves as social-justice warriors, effecting “change” by any means necessary. But members of the media should undergo the same scrutiny they apply to their political enemies, and be held liable under the same laws the rest of the population must abide by. 20. It’s also long past time to strip the “social media” companies and internet giants of the federal protection, specifically section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, that shelters them from liability actions on the grounds that they are “platforms,” not publishers. But as 2020 has shown, they were and are active partisans on the leftist side, slanting and shading the news—and even, in the case of the Hunter Biden laptop bombshell— suppressing it altogether. In sum, we appear to be in uncharted waters. But as the elections of 1800, 1824, 1876, and 2000 have shown, we generally find a way to muddle through. Let the constitutional processes play out, and let’s see who takes the oath of office come January. Michael Walsh is the editor of The- Pipeline. org and the author of “The Devil’s Pleasure Palace” and “The Fiery Angel,” both published by Encounter Books. His latest book, “Last Stands,” a cultural study of military history from the Greeks to the Korean War, will be published in December by St. Martin’s Press.

20 Reasons Election 2020 Is Far From Over

MICHAEL WALSH Now that the media has declared Joe Biden the next president …